Citizen Arrested for “Trespassing” on Public Land: Cry Out!
Here is a portion of the news article by
Many thanks to Jon Magnuson for relaying all our prayers. The whole situation has me thinking of a poem by Robert Bly, Call and Answer.
A deep-running vein of wild ideas & ephemera
Here is a portion of the news article by
Many thanks to Jon Magnuson for relaying all our prayers. The whole situation has me thinking of a poem by Robert Bly, Call and Answer.
In honor of National Parks Week, I’ve just read T. H. Watkin’s book Stone Time (Southern Utah: A Portrait and a Meditation), and Jon Luoma’s The Hidden Forest, which focuses on forest research being conducted in the Andrews Experimental Forest and other National Forest research stations. I’ve also downloaded dozens of brochures from the many National Parks, National Monuments and National Forests I’ll be visiting in May and June, and I’ve installed the “Park Maps” app on my new iPod Touch (the program contains a lot of popular park maps, but just the tip of the NPS/NFS iceberg, and no BLM maps at all).
Gratitude to Old Teachers
Robert Bly
When we stride or stroll across the frozen lake,
We place our feet where they have never been.
We walk upon the unwalked. But we are uneasy.
Who is down there but our old teachers?
….(Read the complete poem at Poetry 180.

Panorama Sunset, Badlands National Park
Check it out: one of the watercolor sketches from my recent artist residency in Badlands National Park is currently featured as the “Park Photo of the Week” at National Parks Traveler!
Preparing for my upcoming roadtrip — 2 months — I’m configuring an iPod Touch to help me stay in touch with my husband while wandering. Step one (not mentioned in the manual) seems to be “make your fingers smaller.” I’ve done way too much rock-gardening, power-sanding, concrete-mixing and finger-smashing over the years, I guess. Feeling very clumsy on this wee 2″ keyboard simulator. Might have to try a stylus tomorrow. Either that, or search the AppStore for some sort of mind-reading-to-text converter program…
Aspen Guard Station (historic U.S. Forest Service ranger station north of Mancos) – originally uploaded by FeVa Fotos
This article in the Durango Herald News (“Cabin Fever” 4-9-10) mentions my upcoming (June) residency at the Aspen Guard Station in the San Juan National Forest.
I feel compelled to mention a strange CBC interview I heard today, with Paola Antonelli, The Museum of Modern Art’s Senior Curator of Architecture and Design. The gist of the story is MoMA’s announcement that it “has acquired the @ symbol into its collection.” Seriously.
Many are dismissing this as a MoMA publicity stunt of dada-esque proportions, in which case I am playing into their hands by wondering aloud how any institution (even if it is a beloved art museum) can say they’ve “acquired” an element of typography with centuries of documented development, ubiquitous contemporary meaning, and global usage. There is no one to acquire @ from (or Everyone – did everyone give them permission?), and no price to negotiate, so it is a terrific bargain for MoMA. They may decide to quit acquiring real art altogether, since it is so darn expensive, and focus on the rest of the keyboard.
My first thought, as I have been considering the demise of the hyphen, was that perhaps I should announce that I’ve “acquired” the hyphen! I’ll just rewrite their press release slightly… On second thought, perhaps I should acquire the question mark while I’m at it — ?????? – since this issue raises so many of them.
After much head-scratching, I decided to look for MoMA’s announcement in print, and found this MoMA blog post by Ms. Antonelli. As in the CBC interview, Antonelli’s post briefly (and articulately) summarizes the history of that typographic mark we now refer to as @, or the “AT sign.” I am certainly fascinated by the history of “@” and would love to learn more about it. Luckily, expect there will be a lovely @ coffee table book published soon. Or perhaps now it is the “@ symbol recently acquired by MoMA” (or will MoMA change it’s name to MoM@)?
Antonelli’s post contains several statements that I would like to quote here. First, after acknowledging that the symbol could not really be purchased, she states “We have acquired the design act in itself…” Wow! So not just the @ symbol, but the whole creative process, the “@ct of Design, brought to you by MoMA.” Statements like this really make me question their institutional hubris. Antonelli also state “The @ symbol is now part of the very fabric of life all over the world.” I would say YES — and this is the very reason that any single institution cannot claim to “acquire” it. I am left to wonder whether the Catholic church will now announce that they’ve “acquired” the cross symbol. Wouldn’t their press releases say the very same thing? “The cross symbol is now part of the very fabric of life all over the world.”
I am left remembering when Monsanto, back in 2005, announced they’d patented their newest genetic invention, the PIG.
MoMA | @ at MoMA.

Cloud over South Dakota
Originally uploaded by miss_distance
Quick sketch in watercolor of a key image from my long drive back from the Badlands to Upper Michigan: CLOUDS. I became quite mesmerized by the clouds. For a long time, it seemed that I was driving at exactly the same *speed* as the cloud’s shadow, neither pulling away from it, nor seeing it pull away from my position on the interstate! Somewhere near the SD-MN border, the sky began clearing, and as the clouds spread apart, each seemed to be a unique character, witch distinct features. The sunlight *beamed* through this one slightly, spotlighting a distant treeline with yellow light, and hiding the rest in shadow. I found the clouds so moving I needed to pull over, and make this sketch.